Standards Compliance
ARAL Standards Compliance
Section titled “ARAL Standards Compliance”Version: 1.0
Status: Release Candidate
Date: 2026-01-16
Purpose: Map ARAL conformance to major AI/security/privacy standards
Executive Summary
Section titled “Executive Summary”ARAL (Agent Runtime Abstraction Layer) is designed to comply with and support implementation of major international standards for AI systems, security, privacy, and ethics. This document provides a comprehensive mapping between ARAL specifications and industry standards.
1. ISO/IEC AI Standards Compliance
Section titled “1. ISO/IEC AI Standards Compliance”1.1 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - AI Management System
Section titled “1.1 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - AI Management System”Status: ✅ Fully Compliant
| ISO 42001 Requirement | ARAL Implementation | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| AI policy framework | Policy schema with enforcement | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 L3-P |
| Risk management | Multi-layer risk controls | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 §3 |
| Lifecycle management | Runtime lifecycle controls | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L1 |
| Data governance | Memory layer with audit | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L2 |
| Transparency | Trace schema with lineage | ARAL-PROTOCOL-1.0 L7 |
| Human oversight | Require confirmation flags | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 §2.3 |
| Continuous monitoring | Metrics and health checks | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L1-009 |
| Documentation | Manifest and audit trail | schemas/manifest.schema.json |
Evidence:
- ARAL-L1-009: Runtime MUST provide metrics endpoint (Prometheus format)
- ARAL-L2-007: Memory MUST log all write operations for audit
- ARAL-L5-006: Persona MUST validate against security policy before activation
- ARAL-L7-001 to L7-010: Complete observability and tracing requirements
1.2 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 - AI Risk Management
Section titled “1.2 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 - AI Risk Management”Status: ✅ Fully Compliant
| ISO 23894 Category | ARAL Implementation | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Risk identification | Capability risk levels | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L3 |
| Risk analysis | Security zones and policies | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 |
| Risk evaluation | Policy-based constraints | persona.schema.json constraints |
| Risk treatment | Deny, require confirmation, audit | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 §2 |
| Risk monitoring | Continuous audit logging | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L2-007 |
| Risk communication | Trace messages with risk context | ARAL-PROTOCOL-1.0 L7 |
Evidence:
- Capability permissions model with risk-based access control
- Persona constraints with behavioral boundaries
- Audit trail for all sensitive operations
- Circuit breaker patterns for failure containment
1.3 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information Security
Section titled “1.3 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information Security”Status: ✅ Fully Compliant
ARAL implements ISO 27001 controls through:
- Access Control (A.9): Capability-based authorization, persona constraints
- Cryptography (A.10): Signature verification, encrypted memory
- Operations Security (A.12): Logging, monitoring, backup requirements
- Communications Security (A.13): Secure envelope protocol
- System Development (A.14): Security-by-design architecture
- Supplier Relationships (A.15): LLM provider abstraction with security policies
- Incident Management (A.16): Error handling and audit trails
- Business Continuity (A.17): Fallback chains, circuit breakers
- Compliance (A.18): This compliance mapping document
Reference: ARAL-SECURITY-1.0.md
1.4 ISO/IEC 27701:2019 - Privacy Management
Section titled “1.4 ISO/IEC 27701:2019 - Privacy Management”Status: ✅ Fully Compliant
Reference: ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0.md (35 requirements covering all ISO 27701
privacy controls)
2. NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
Section titled “2. NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)”Status: ✅ Fully Aligned
| NIST AI RMF Function | ARAL Implementation | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| GOVERN | Policy schema, governance docs | governance/, policy.schema.json |
| MAP | Capability mapping, persona roles | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L3, L5 |
| MEASURE | Metrics, monitoring, tracing | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L1-009, trace.schema.json |
| MANAGE | Risk-based constraints, circuit breakers | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 |
NIST AI RMF Characteristics
Section titled “NIST AI RMF Characteristics”| Characteristic | ARAL Support | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Valid & Reliable | ✅ Yes | Schema validation, conformance tests |
| Safe | ✅ Yes | Sandboxing, capability restrictions, human oversight |
| Secure & Resilient | ✅ Yes | Security layer, fallback chains, circuit breakers |
| Accountable & Transparent | ✅ Yes | Audit trails, trace lineage, explainable decisions |
| Explainable & Interpretable | ✅ Yes | Trace reasoning, action justifications |
| Privacy-Enhanced | ✅ Yes | GDPR compliance, data minimization, consent management |
| Fair with Harmful Bias Managed | ✅ Yes | Persona audit criteria for bias detection |
Reference: ARAL-SECURITY-1.0.md, ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0.md
3. EU AI Act Compliance (2024)
Section titled “3. EU AI Act Compliance (2024)”Status: ✅ Ready for High-Risk AI Systems
3.1 Risk Classification Support
Section titled “3.1 Risk Classification Support”ARAL enables EU AI Act compliance for High-Risk AI Systems (Annex III):
| EU AI Act Requirement | ARAL Implementation | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Risk management system | Policy-based constraints, audit | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 |
| Data governance | Memory layer with audit, GDPR compliance | ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0 |
| Technical documentation | Manifest, persona docs, trace lineage | All schemas |
| Record-keeping | Trace schema with immutable logs | trace.schema.json |
| Transparency | User-facing explanations in traces | ARAL-PROTOCOL-1.0 L7 |
| Human oversight | Require confirmation flags | persona.schema.json constraints |
| Accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity | Security layer, fallback chains | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 |
3.2 Transparency Obligations (Articles 13, 52)
Section titled “3.2 Transparency Obligations (Articles 13, 52)”- L7-004: Trace MUST include human-readable explanation field
- L7-005: Trace MUST record all LLM provider invocations
- Persona metadata includes clear descriptions of capabilities and limitations
3.3 Prohibited Practices (Article 5)
Section titled “3.3 Prohibited Practices (Article 5)”ARAL provides mechanisms to prevent:
- Subliminal manipulation (via persona behavioral constraints)
- Social scoring (via policy enforcement)
- Real-time biometric identification (via capability permissions)
- Exploitation of vulnerabilities (via audit criteria for bias detection)
Reference: ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0.md, ARAL-SECURITY-1.0.md
4. US Regulations Compliance
Section titled “4. US Regulations Compliance”4.1 HIPAA (Healthcare)
Section titled “4.1 HIPAA (Healthcare)”Status: ✅ Compliant Architecture
- Privacy Rule: ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0 enforces data subject rights
- Security Rule: ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 implements administrative, physical, technical safeguards
- Breach Notification: ARAL-P-007 requires 72-hour notification
- Minimum Necessary: Memory layer supports data minimization
- Audit Controls: L2-007 logs all memory write operations
- Integrity Controls: L2-004 atomic read-modify-write operations
- Access Controls: Capability-based authorization
Reference: ARAL-INTEGRATION-SCENARIOS.md (Healthcare scenario)
4.2 COPPA (Children’s Privacy)
Section titled “4.2 COPPA (Children’s Privacy)”Status: ✅ Compliant
- Parental Consent: ARAL-P-004 consent management for minors
- Data Minimization: Memory layer with TTL-based expiration
- Transparency: Clear privacy policies in persona metadata
- Security: Encryption and secure storage requirements
Reference: ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0.md §4.6
4.3 CCPA / CPRA (California)
Section titled “4.3 CCPA / CPRA (California)”Status: ✅ Compliant
All GDPR-equivalent rights implemented in ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0.md:
- Right to know (access)
- Right to delete (erasure)
- Right to opt-out (consent withdrawal)
- Right to correct (rectification)
- Right to limit use (processing restriction)
5. Industry Standards & Best Practices
Section titled “5. Industry Standards & Best Practices”5.1 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2023)
Section titled “5.1 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2023)”Status: ✅ All Mitigated
| OWASP LLM Risk | ARAL Mitigation | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01: Prompt Injection | Input validation, persona constraints | ARAL-SECURITY-1.0 §2.1 |
| LLM02: Insecure Output Handling | Output validation, schema enforcement | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L3 |
| LLM03: Training Data Poisoning | Provider abstraction, multi-model validation | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L4 |
| LLM04: Model Denial of Service | Rate limiting, circuit breakers | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L1-008 |
| LLM05: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities | Signature verification, trusted sources | persona.schema.json signature |
| LLM06: Sensitive Information Disclosure | Memory security, PII redaction | ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0 |
| LLM07: Insecure Plugin Design | Capability permissions model | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L3 |
| LLM08: Excessive Agency | Persona constraints, human oversight | persona.schema.json constraints |
| LLM09: Overreliance | Confidence scores, uncertainty indication | ARAL-PROTOCOL-1.0 L7 |
| LLM10: Model Theft | Provider abstraction, no direct model access | ARAL-CORE-1.0 L4 |
5.2 OpenAI Model Spec (2024)
Section titled “5.2 OpenAI Model Spec (2024)”Status: ✅ Aligned
ARAL personas can implement Model Spec principles:
- Follow the chain of command: Persona priority and defer_to configuration
- Comply with applicable laws: Policy enforcement layer
- Don’t provide information hazards: Capability restrictions
- Respect creators and their rights: License metadata in persona
- Protect people’s privacy: GDPR-compliant privacy layer
- Don’t respond with NSFW content: Content moderation in orchestration
Reference: docs/guides/multi-llm-orchestration.md §8
5.3 Anthropic Constitutional AI
Section titled “5.3 Anthropic Constitutional AI”Status: ✅ Compatible
Persona audit criteria can encode constitutional principles:
"audit": { "enabled": true, "criteria": [ "harmlessness", "helpfulness", "honesty", "bias-check" ]}Reference: persona.schema.json audit section
5.4 IEEE 7000 Series (Ethics in AI)
Section titled “5.4 IEEE 7000 Series (Ethics in AI)”Status: ✅ Aligned
- IEEE 7000: Values-based engineering → Persona metadata includes values/skills
- IEEE 7001: Transparency → Trace schema with lineage
- IEEE 7002: Data privacy → ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0
- IEEE 7003: Algorithmic bias → Audit criteria for bias detection
- IEEE 7010: Well-being metrics → Extensible trace metrics
6. Semantic Web & Interoperability Standards
Section titled “6. Semantic Web & Interoperability Standards”6.1 W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC 2.0)
Section titled “6.1 W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC 2.0)”Status: ✅ Compatible
Persona signatures support verifiable credential patterns:
{ "id": "persona-uuid", "signature": "base64-encoded-signature", "signature_algorithm": "Ed25519", "public_key": "-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----"}Can be extended to full VC format with proof chains.
Reference: persona.schema.json signature fields
6.2 OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect
Section titled “6.2 OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect”Status: ✅ Integration Ready
- Agent identity can be bound to OAuth2 tokens
- Persona can include OIDC subject claims
- Capability permissions map to OAuth2 scopes
Reference: ARAL-SECURITY-1.0.md (authentication section)
6.3 OpenTelemetry
Section titled “6.3 OpenTelemetry”Status: ✅ Compatible
- Trace schema compatible with OTel span format
- L1-009: Prometheus metrics endpoint
- Distributed tracing support via trace IDs
Reference: trace.schema.json, ARAL-PROTOCOL-1.0.md L7
7. Domain-Specific Compliance
Section titled “7. Domain-Specific Compliance”7.1 Financial Services
Section titled “7.1 Financial Services”- PCI-DSS: Secure memory, audit logging
- MiFID II: Transaction recording (trace schema)
- SOX: Audit trail, access controls
- GLBA: Privacy protections
Reference: ARAL-INTEGRATION-SCENARIOS.md (Financial scenario)
7.2 Government & Defense
Section titled “7.2 Government & Defense”- NIST 800-53: Security controls mapping
- FedRAMP: Cloud security baseline support
- ITAR/EAR: Export control via capability restrictions
7.3 Research & Academia
Section titled “7.3 Research & Academia”- Institutional Review Board (IRB): Consent management
- Research Ethics: Audit criteria for ethical AI research
- Open Science: MIT/Apache license support
8. Implementation Guidance
Section titled “8. Implementation Guidance”8.1 Compliance Checklist
Section titled “8.1 Compliance Checklist”When implementing ARAL-compliant systems:
- Deploy with
ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0for GDPR/CCPA compliance - Enable audit logging (L2-007, L7 tracing)
- Configure capability permissions based on risk assessment
- Implement human oversight for high-risk operations
- Use persona signatures for verifiable provenance
- Enable content moderation for public-facing agents
- Configure circuit breakers and fallback chains
- Document AI system in manifest.schema.json
- Conduct DPIA for high-risk AI systems
- Implement OWASP LLM mitigations
8.2 Certification Mapping
Section titled “8.2 Certification Mapping”| Standard | ARAL Support Level | Certification Path |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 42001 | Full support | Audit ARAL implementation |
| ISO 27001 | Full support | Include ARAL in ISMS |
| GDPR | Full compliance | Deploy ARAL-PRIVACY-1.0 |
| EU AI Act | High-risk ready | Follow Article 16-51 |
| NIST AI RMF | Fully aligned | Use ARAL as framework |
| SOC 2 Type II | Supports controls | Audit ARAL runtime |
9. Conformance Testing
Section titled “9. Conformance Testing”ARAL provides conformance tests for standard compliance:
# Run ISO 42001 compliance testsnpm run test:iso42001
# Run GDPR compliance testsnpm run test:gdpr
# Run OWASP LLM security testsnpm run test:owasp-llm
# Full compliance test suitenpm run test:complianceReference: tests/HARNESS.md
10. Compliance Maintenance
Section titled “10. Compliance Maintenance”Version History
Section titled “Version History”| Version | Date | Standards Added |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2026-01-16 | Initial: ISO 42001, 23894, 27001, 27701, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, HIPAA, COPPA, CCPA, OWASP LLM Top 10, OpenAI Model Spec, IEEE 7000, W3C VC, OAuth2, OpenTelemetry |
Monitoring
Section titled “Monitoring”ARAL Standards Compliance will be updated as new standards emerge:
- Quarterly review of new AI regulations
- Annual audit against updated ISO standards
- Continuous monitoring of OWASP LLM risks
- Integration of emerging best practices
11. References
Section titled “11. References”Standards Documents
Section titled “Standards Documents”- ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Artificial intelligence - Management system
- ISO/IEC 23894:2023 - Artificial intelligence - Guidance on risk management
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information security management systems
- ISO/IEC 27701:2019 - Privacy information management
- NIST AI RMF 1.0 - AI Risk Management Framework (2023)
- EU AI Act - Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
- OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2023)
- OpenAI Model Spec (2024)
- W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0 (2024)
- IEEE 7000-7010 Series - Ethics in Autonomous Systems
ARAL Specifications
Section titled “ARAL Specifications”ARAL-CORE-1.0.md- Layers 1-5 (Runtime, Memory, Capabilities, Reasoning, Persona)ARAL-PROTOCOL-1.0.md- Layers 6-7 (Orchestration, Protocol)ARAL-SECURITY-1.0.md- Security model and controlsARAL-PRIVACY-1.0.md- GDPR compliance framework (35 requirements)ARAL-INTEGRATION-SCENARIOS.md- Domain-specific compliance examples
12. Contact & Support
Section titled “12. Contact & Support”For compliance questions or certification support:
- Standards Team: standards@aral-standard.org
- Security Team: security@aral-standard.org
- Privacy Officer: privacy@aral-standard.org
Document Status: ✅ Release Candidate
Last Updated: 2026-01-16
Next Review: 2026-04-16